From affolder@neutrino.physics.ucsb.edu Mon Jun 21 13:34:44 2004 Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 12:42:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Anthony Allen Affolder To: Joe Incandela Cc: alice bean , Andrea L Allen , Nicola Bacchetta , Baringer@ukans.edu, bkahl@fnal.gov, Heriberto Castilla-Valdez , Claudio Campagnari , Derek Barge , Dean White , Marcel Demarteau , Don Copage , Elizaveta Chabalina , Ricardo Eusebi , Eva_Halkiadakis , Gabriella Pasztor , Gail Hanson , Patrick Gartung , Cecilia Gerber , David Hale , Andy Hocker , James M. Lamb , kenan@fnal.gov, Susanne Kyre , Lenny Spiegel , Leonard Christofek , Brad Patterson , Regina Demina , Ronzhin@fnal.gov, Russell Taylor , Sam Burke , Lance Simms , Sergey Korjenevski , Julie Stoner , Sean Stromberg , Paul Tipton , Slawomir Tkaczyk , t10@fnal.gov, Ryan Hooper , Greg Landsberg , kalavase@neutrino.physics.ucsb.edu Subject: Hybrid Thermal Testing Review Hi all, Here's a reminder of the hybrid thermal testing review which will occur tommorrow (Tuesday) at 3:30 FNAL time. The AD-Hoc number is 82757. If anyone has problems connecting, please call 805-893-7569. Everyone please be ready on time, as I have to leave by 5:10 FNAL time. The opening topic of discussion are: 1)Data taking/analysis a)Update on how testing is proceeding. Are there any recurring problems (false channel flagging, etc.)? b)How are the hybrids graded, i.e. how bad can they be and still be usable? c)What procedures are we following with failures (especially in the cold)? 2) Database a) What are we uploading to the database (format, etc.)? Is it sufficient? b) Is the database uploading automated? What do we need to do to incorporate it into Bruno's code? 3) Equipment a) What has failed so far? b) What is our status with spares (ARCS equipment, NIM, peltiers)? 4) AOB, again focusing on needed work in the US or elsewhere. This should include answering Lenny's questions which are in the attached email. Lance has been working on updating our current version of the code to do the PLL forcing, and has determined it is not possible in the necessary time scale. Instead, he believes we need upgrade our code to match the code at CERN. In the past, this was not successful, but Bruno is now providing tools in which to de-bug the problems we were having with the new code. I believe this is the correct course of action. Once we do this, any changes made by CERN can be easily adopted here. Lance will detail the work needed to be done in order to finish the upgrade and what help he will need. Please make your slide available before the meeting. I will link them and a copy of Lenny's questions to my web page. See you there, Tony [ Part 2, "" Text/PLAIN (Name: "lenny.txt") 70 lines. ] [ Unable to print this part. ]