Minutes of the August 23, 2005 US ROD production mini-workshop

Attendees: Claudio, Jim, Puneeth, Steve J., Lenny, Slawek, Yuri, Ryan, Marvin

Thermistors
Some thermistors are read through DCUs, some are not. 

Non-DCU-thermistors are tested with Ryan's box.  The new UCSB SRT GUI has provisions to enter info in SRT
text file.  The script that makes the XML file needs to grab this information and stick it in the XML file.
A first version of this exists at UCSB.  Careful, because XML generation runs after MRT, SRT data is on
different computer.  At UCSB disks are nfs-mounted, at FNAL afs-mounted (?), not a big problem but need
to pay attention.

Action Item: FNAL to install new SRT GUI from UCSB.

Info from DCU-thermistors from Ryan's macro, except that those of modules 2&6 are not there because
read through DCU on CCU.

Action Item: Ryan to modify his macro to flag these also

Old (double) ICC4 cards were jumpered wrong.  New ICC cards have problem fixed.

Somewhat arbitrary decision: a good rod will need to have 2 out of 3 non-DCU thermistors functioning.

Other Action Item: Check resistivity of non-DCU thermistors after power cycling.  On a couple of rods, both
UCSB and FNAL.

XML File
We went through a sample XML file to understand what is going into it.  All the Action Items in this section should be followed up by Steve.

There is now a section for each module for 1st warm, last cold, and last warm
Action Item: Add results from 1st cold

Right now, only storing PeakInvOn info.
Action Item: Add DecInvOn.  Also, make sure that they are labelled sensibly

We all thought that we should have more information on what modules are in the rod and how Lt was run
Action Item: Add module ID as well as module position.  Append settings.xml file

Other Action Items about XML files:

Scenario
Currently  W -> C -> W -> C -> W -> C -> W -> C ->W   (C=cold, W=warm).

Takes 2 days at FNAL.  Longer at UCSB, recently it has taken as much as 10 hours to go cold.
Action Item: UCSB to figure out why it is taking so long

Decide to keep this scenario, and decide to continue doing full suite of tests, with results stored in root file, at each stage.

Action Item: add a CalProf run to SR scenario, make sure that it shows up in Ryan's macro (Ryan)

Criteria for bad channels
We reviewed cuts proposed by Steve.  They look fine. 
UCSB still has somewhat high CMN, which means that opens are flipped, and are flagged as "unkown" in noise tests, then flagged correctly in other tests.

Action Item: UCSB to try to lower noise

Double sided rods

As soon as DS rods modules are avialble, build DS rods for Duccio's request
Action Item: FNAL to build one DS_L ID=1 and 3 DS_L ID>2.  UCSB to build one DS_L ID=2 and 3 DS_L ID>2

ICC cards swap

We all agree that best done at CERN. 
CERN bare-rod testing done with SW we do not have, at higher speeds, etc.
Action Item: Claudio to contact Duccio, see what their thinking is

FEC Software
FEC SW V3 now exists.  We have V1.something + patches. 
Aim of new SW is to be same as XDAQ, + add functionality (mostly for debugging).

Digital Tests

New version of Lt (v30) will have ProgramTest in it, can be made part of scenario.
Action Item: Claudio to remind Marchioro that we need well defined digital tests list

Residual I2C errors

Yuri: Latest FEC SW + ProgramTest, 6 rods: errors 64 and 68.  Errors persist with two rods, go away with only one.  Consistent with hypothesis that these are ring errors.  Similar effects at UCSB.

Wim trying to install FEC SW V3 at FNAL.

Action Item: Yuri to schedule joint meeting with Guido, Wim, Frederic for this Thursday on VRVS.

Header Errors
Still seen at UCSB, not in a while at FNAL.  Will be discussed at meeting above.

Noise Study
How can we contribute to decision on ICC cards grounding?
Action Item: FNAL SR test with Option 7 cards with and without ground connection.  Remember to not let cooling pipes floating

Optical FEC
Still requires some mods at CERN. 
Do we want them.  Yes, if we get it in time, and we get help in installing.

Spares
UCSB needs more jumper cables and power cable
Action Item: Steve to email Lenny

One Delphi supply at UCSB is flaky. 
Action Item: Claudio will write to Duccio

Rod Grading

If we see a pinhole, immediate rework.
ARCS module grading criteria:
For rods DefAna grades each module.  After lots of discussion, we agrred on the following rod grading:
Action Item: Steve to implement in XML file


AOB
Action Item: FNAL needs to follow up on modules that were removed from rods for various reasons

Action Item: Both UCSB and FNAL to prepare "anecdotal" list of problems encountered in July production